Logiche dell’azione: contenuto e raffigurazione nell’enattivismo radicale e in Wittgenstein / The logic of action: content and representation in radical enactivism and Wittgenstein
Abstract
Daniel Hutto’s proposal is to compare Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations to Enactive Theory of Mind. In this paper, we try to come back to Hutto’s works on the Tractatus logico-philosophicus. We retain, as Hutto, that there is a strong continuity between early Wittgenstein’s thought and his later conceptions. But we hold that in the Tractatus the more characteristic theses constituting the picture-theory need to receive a greater weight than in Hutto’s reading. Hutto’s insight at any rate will afford in this paper only some hints useful for the development of remarks about the picture-theory that can be considered as independent with regard to their logical and conceptual grounds.Riferimenti bibliografici
Candlish, Stewart (2007), The Russell/Bradley Dispute and its Significance for Twientieth Century Philosophy, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke.
Candlish, Stewart; Damnjanovic, Nic (2012), The Tractatus and the Unity of the Proposition, in Zalabardo José, a cura di, Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy, Oxford UP, Oxford.
Di Prospero, Alfonso (2016), «Idealismo e realismo secondo l’ontologia del Tractatus logico-philosophicus», in Philosophy Kitchen, n. 4 (6), pp. 139-151.
Emiliani, Alberto (2004), The Immediacy of Semantic Agreement, in Coliva Annalisa, Picardi Eva, a cura di, Wittgenstein Today, Poligrafo, Padova, pp. 25-48.
Hintikka, Jaakko; Hintikka, Merrill (1986), Investigating Wittgenstein, Basil, Oxford (Indagine su Wittgenstein, trad. di M. Alai, Mulino, Bologna 1990).
Hutto, Daniel (2000), Beyond Phjsicalism, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Hutto, Daniel (2004), More Making Sense of Nonsense, in Stoker Barry, a cura di, Post analytic Tractatus, Ashgate, Burligton, pp. 127-149.
Hutto, Daniel (2005), «Kowing what? Radical versus Conservative Enactivism», in Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, n. 4 (4), pp. 389-405.
Hutto, Daniel (2006), Both Bradley and Biology, in Menary Richard, ed., Radical Enactivism: Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narratives. Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 81-105.
Hutto, Daniel (2009), «Lessons from Wittgenstein: Elucidating Folk Psychology», in New Ideas in Psychology, n. 27 (2), pp. 197-212.
Hutto, Daniel (2013), «Enactivism, From A Wittgensteinian Point of View», in American Philosophical Quarterly, n. 50 (3), pp. 281-302.
Hutto, Daniel (2016), «Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus logico-philsophicus», in Topoi, n. 35, pp. 617-626.
Hutto, Daniel (2017), «REC: Revolution Effected by Clarification», in Topoi, n. 36 (3), pp. 377-391.
Hutto, Daniel, Myin, Erik (2013), Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Hutto, Daniel (2017), Evolving Enactivism, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Hutto, Daniel, Satne, Glenda (2015), «Introduction: Searching for the Natural Origins of Content», in Philosophia, n. 43, pp. 505-519.
Hutto, Daniel, Satne, Glenda (2018), «Wittgenstein’s Inspiring View of Nature: On Connecting Philosophy and Science Aright», in Philosophical Investigations, n. 41 (2), pp. 141-160.
Loughlin, Victor (2014), «Radical Enactivism, Wittgenstein and the Cognitive Gap», in Adaptive Behaviour, n. 22 (5), pp. 350-359.
Luhmann, Niklas (1986), Ökologische Kommunikation, Verlag, Opladen (Comunicazione ecologica, trad. di R. Sutter, Franco Angeli, Milano 1989).
Matar, Anat (2015), Ménage à trois: Saying, Showing, Acting, in Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle; Munz, Volker; Coliva, Annalisa, a cura di, Mind, Language and Action, De Gruyter, Berlin & New York, pp. 157-168.
Maturana, Humberto; Varela, Francisco (1984), El àrbol del conocimiento, (L’albero della conoscenza, trad. di G. Meloni, Garzanti, Milano 1995.
Menary, Richard (2006), What is radical Enactivism?, in Menary Richard, a cura di, Radical Enactivism: Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narratives. Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp.1-12.
Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle (2013), «Wittgenstein’s Razor: the Cutting Edge of Enactivism», in American Philosophical Quarterly, n. 50 (3), pp. 263-279.
Myin, Erik, Hutto Daniel (2015), «REC: Just Radical Enough», in Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, n. 41 (54), pp. 61-71.
Sacchi, Dario (1981), Unità e relazione, Vita e Pensiero, Milano.
Schlick, Moritz (1979), Form and Content, in Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 285-369 (Forma e contenuto, trad. di P. Parrini e S. Ciolli Parrini, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino 1987).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1922), Tractatus logico-philosophicus, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (Tractatus logico-philosophicus e Quaderni 1914-1916, trad. di A. G. Conte, Einaudi, Torino 1998).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1960), Tagebücher 1914-1916, in Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Tagebücher 1914-1916. Philosophische Untersuchungen, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp (Quaderni 1914-1916, trad. di A. G. Conte in Tractatus logico-philosophicus e Quaderni 1914-1916, Einaudi, Torino).
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
