Uno strano triangolo: Peirce, la democrazia e la retorica
Abstract
Although the connection between Peirce and democracy may at first seem strange, recently two scholars, Cheryl Misak and Robert Talisse, have outlined a theory of democracy based on Peirce’s thought and in particular on one of his most famous and controversial text, The Fixation of Belief. In this paper, I describe first the main points of this theory, showing how it falls within the broader category of theories of deliberative democracy and in particular in the variant that is called epistemic democracy. Then, I try to show that also the theory formulated by Talisse and Misak meets the same difficulties that characterize different formulations of epistemic democracy, difficulties arising from the decision to exclude any reference to the rhetorical dimension.References
BACON, Michael (2010), «The politics of truth: a critique of Peircean deliberative democracy», Philosophy and Social Criticism, 36, 9: 1075-1091.
DI PIAZZA, Salvatore – PIAZZA, Francesca – SERRA, Mauro (in stampa), «Does Public Deliberation really need Normative Constraints? Recovering the Aristotelian Rhetorical Theory», in Proceedings of European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon, 9-12 June 2015.
FADDA, Emanuele (2013), Peirce, Roma, Carocci.
HABERMAS, Jürgen (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, The MIT Press, Cambridge (Ma).
HOOK, Sidney (1939), John Dewey: An Intellectual Portrait, John Day, New York.
HOOPES, James (1998), Community Denied: The Wrong Turn of Pragmatic Liberalism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
MACGILVRAY, Erik (2014), «Democratic Doubts: Pragmatism and the Epistemic Defense of Democracy», Journal of Political Philosophy, 22, 1: 105-123.
MISAK, Cheryl (2000), Truth, Politics, Morality, Routledge, New York.
MISAK, Cheryl (2004a), Truth and the End of Inquiry, Oxford University Press, New York-Oxford.
MISAK, Cheryl (2004b), «Making Disagreement Matter: Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy», Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18, 1: 9-22.
MISAK, Cheryl – TALISSE, Robert B. (2014), «Debate: Pragmatist Epistemology and Democratic Theory: A Reply to Erik MacGilvray», Journal of Political Philosophy, 22, 3: 366-376.
RYDENFELT, Henrik (in stampa), «Democracy and Moral Inquiry: Misak’s Methodological Argument», in J. Ryder, C. Mougan, (eds.). Democracy, Society and Culture, Rodopi, Amsterdam and New York, accessibile on line nordprag.org/hr/Democracy%20and%20Moral%20Inquiry. Pdf, consultato il 24 maggio 2015.
RYDENFELT, Henrik (2011), «Epistemic Norms and Democracy. A Response to Talisse», Metaphilosophy, 42: 572-588.
SCHEFFLER, Israel (1974), Four Pragmatists, Routledge, New York.
TALISSE, Robert B. (2005), Democracy after Liberalism, Routledge, New York.
TALISSE, Robert B. (2007), A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy, Routledge, New York.
TALISSE, Robert B. (2010), «Peirce and Pragmatist Democratic Theory», in M. Bergman, S. Paavola, A.-V. Pietarinen, H. Rydenfelt (eds.), Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference, Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 1. Helsinki: Nordic: 105-116.
URBINATI, Nadia (2014), Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass).
WESTBROOK, Robert B. (2006), «Liberal Democracy», in J.R. Shook, J. Margolis, A Companion to Pragmatism, Blackwell, Malden-Oxford.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
