Il gioco del disaccordo: persuasione, comunità, linguaggio in Wittgenstein e Platone (con un terzo incomodo) / The game of disagreement: persuasion, community, language in Wittgenstein and Plato (with a third wheel)

  • Mauro Serra
Keywords: persuasion, disagreement, politics, Wittgenstein, Plato

Abstract

Although Wittgenstein in his writings has not explicitly dealt with politics, his thought has urged a wide range of attempts to explore the political meaning of Wittgenstein’s texts. In this perspective, the remarks contained in On Certainty appear particularly promising. Here the Austrian philosopher raises a number of issues of fundamental importance to investigate the nature of the relationship between community and language. In particular, it is the problematic link between persuasion and disagreement to form the subject of numerous remarks of great acumen and relevance. In order to put into perspective the fundamental questions that Wittgenstein faces about the nature of the relationship between language and social practice and the role of both persuasion and disagreement, I propose a comparison between Wittgenstein’s remarks and a passage of Plato’s Protagoras, which, in seemingly very different way, faces similar problems. Through this comparison it will be possible not only to focus on issues that still seem to be rewarding today when investigating on the complex relationship between persuasion, community and language, but also to see a third figure appearing in the background: that of the sophist.

References

COHEN, Jonathan R. (2002), «Philosophy is Education is Politics: The Dramatic Interlude in the Protagoras», in Ancient Philosophy, n. 22, pp. 1-20

FELDMAN, Richard, WARFIELD, Ted A. (2010), Disagreement, Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York.

GUNNELL, John G. (2014), Social Inquiry after Wittgenstein and Kuhn. Leaving Everything as it is, Columbia University Press, New York.

KANT, Immanuel (1781), Kritik der reiner Vernunft, de Gruyter, Berlin 1909-1910 (Critica della Ragion Pura, trad. di Gentile Giovanni-Lombardo Radice Giuseppe, revisione Mathieu Vittorio, Laterza, Roma-Bari 1985).

KERFERD, George B. (1981), The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

LAVERY, Jonathan (2007), Plato’s Protagoras: Negotiating impartial, common standards of discourse, in HANSEN, H.V. et. al. a cura di, Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, CD-ROM, Windsor, ON: OSSA, pp. 1-13.

LI VIGNI, Fiorinda (2016), Persuasione, seduzione, inganno. Omero, Eschilo, Gorgia, La scuola di Pitagora, Napoli.

LO PIPARO, Franco (2016), «Un flauto e tre bambini. Verità, guerra e consenso», in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio - Building Consensus, pp. 166-175.

MARA, Gerald M. (1997), Socrates’ Discursive Democracy, State University of New York Press, Albany.

MAZZEO, Marco (2016), Il bambino e l’operaio. Wittgenstein filosofo dell’uso, Quodlibet, Macerata.

MOUFFE, Chantal (2000), The Democratic Paradox, Verso, London.

NEHAMAS, Alexander (1990), «Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato’s Demarcation of Philosophy from Sophistry», in History of Philosophy Quarterly, n. 7, pp. 3-16.

PERISSINOTTO, Luigi (2015), «How Long has the Earth Existed? Persuasion and World-Picture in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty», in Philosophical Investigations, n. 39, 2, pp. 154-177.

PIAZZA, Francesca, SERRA, Mauro, (2012), a cura di, «Accordo e disaccordo», in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, vol. 6, n. 3.

PLATONE, Tutti gli scritti, a cura di G. Reale, Bompiani, Milano 2000.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques (1995), La mésentente, Editions Galilée, Paris.

SALIS, Pietro (2017), «Does persuasion really come at “the end of reasons”?», in Aa.Vv., Verità, immagine, normatività, Quodlibet, Macerata, pp. 77-100.

SERRA, Mauro (2016), «Verso una concezione agonistica del dialogo: una prospettiva neosofistica», in Teoria, XXXVI, 1, pp. 7-24.

SERRA, Mauro (2017), Retorica, argomentazione, democrazia. Per una filosofia politica del linguaggio, Aracne, Canterano (RM).

SPINICCI, Paolo (2000), Il mondo della vita e il problema della certezza. Lezioni su Husserl e Wittgenstein, Cuem, Milano.

TAFOLLA, Vincent M. (2015), «Community and Constraint: The Crisis at the Heart of Plato’s Protagoras», in Philosophy and Rhetoric, n. 48, 2, pp. 162-185.

VLASTOS, Gregory (1994), Socratic Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig (1953), Philosophische Untersuchungen, Basil Blackwell, Oxford (Ricerche filosofiche, trad. di Trinchero M. Piovesan R., Einaudi, Torino).

WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig (1969), Über Gewissheit, Oxford (Della certezza, trad. di Trinchero M., Einaudi, Torino 1978).

ZAGARELLA, Roberta (2016), «Perché argomentiamo? Consenso e dissenso tra retorica e democrazia», in Rivista Italiana di filosofia del Linguaggio – Building Consensus, pp. 310-318.

How to Cite
Serra, M. (1) “Il gioco del disaccordo: persuasione, comunità, linguaggio in Wittgenstein e Platone (con un terzo incomodo) / The game of disagreement: persuasion, community, language in Wittgenstein and Plato (with a third wheel)”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 00. Available at: http://rifl.unical.it/index.php/rifl/article/view/456 (Accessed: 26September2020).

Most read articles by the same author(s)