Lottare e coalizzare. Come riproduzione sociale e intersezionalità reinventano il conflitto

  • Adalgiso Amendola
Parole chiave: conflict, social reproduction, intersectionality, oppression, exploitation

Abstract

The modern tradition has always thought of conflict as subordinated to its political neutralisation. The model of permanent civil war presented by Michel Foucault only partially succeeds in presenting a model of conflict that is not subordinated to the reassertion of sovereignty. The class struggle itself, presented as a mode of conflict capable of producing a transformation of the entire political field, was reabsorbed into the presence of a homogeneous working class, which neutralised singularities and differences. The new focus on the centrality of social reproduction, on the one hand, and the development of intersectional theories, on the other, have profoundly transformed the grammars of conflicts and subjectivities, while still risking reproducing the classical separation between conflicts over exploitation and conflicts over oppression, and between conflicts over identity and conflicts over production. The rethinking of a unitary matrix between exploitation and oppression can lead to the elaboration of unprecedented coalitions, in the sign of a multitudinous class that overcomes the opposition between class conflict and identity politics.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Balibar, Ètienne (1974), Cinq études du matérialism historique, Maspero, Paris (Cinque studi di materialismo storico, trad. it. di, Claudia Mancina, Pgreco, Milano 2014).

Bohrer, Ashely J. (2019), Marxism and Intersectionality. Race, Gender, Class and Sexuality under Contemporary Capitalism, transcript, Bielefeld.

Crenshaw, Kimberlé (1989), «Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist

Policies», in University of Chicago Legal Forum, n.1: 139-167.

Foucault, Michel (1997), “Il faut défendre la societé”, Seuil-Gallimard, Paris (Bisogna difendere la società, trad. it. a cura di, Mauro Bertani e Alessandro Fontana, Feltrinelli, Milano 1998).

Foucault, Michel (2013), La societé primitive, Seuil-Gallimard, Paris (La società primitiva, trad. it. a cura di, Deborah Borca e Pier Aldo Rovatti, Feltrinelli, Milano 2016).

Fraser, Nancy (2013), Fortunes of feminism: from state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis, Verso, London (Fortune del femminismo, trad. it. di, A. Curcio, Ombre Corte, Verona 2014).

Fraser, Nancy (2022), Cannibal Capitalism: How Our System Is Devouring Democracy, Care, and the Planet – and What We Can Do about It, Verso, London (Capitalismo cannibale, trad. it. a cura di, Federico Lopiparo, Laterza, Bari-Roma, 2023).

Hardt, Negri (2019), «Empire, Twenty Years On» in New Left Review, n.120: 67-92

Mezzadra, Sandro (2021), «Intersectionality, Identity, and the Riddle of Class» in Papeles del CEIC, vol. 2021-2022, heredada n.3: 1-10.

Schmitt C. (1963), Der Begriff des Politischen. Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 1963 (Il concetto di politico, Le categorie del “politico”, trad. it. a cura di, Gianfranco Miglio e Pierangelo Schiera, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1972).

Strauss, Leo (1932), Anmerkungen zu Carl Schmitt, Der Begriff des Politischen (1932), in Gesammelte Schriften, Band 3: Hobbes’politische Wissenschaft und zugehörige Schriften – Briefe, hrsg. von H. und W. Meier, Metzler, Stuttgart/Weimar, 2001 (Note su «Il concetto di politico» di Carl Schmitt, trad. it. di, C. Badocco, in H. Meier, Carl Schmitt e Leo Strauss. Per una critica della teologia politica, a cura di, C. Cantagalli, Cantagalli, Siena 2011).

Pubblicato
2024-07-25
Come citare
Amendola, A. (2024) «Lottare e coalizzare. Come riproduzione sociale e intersezionalità reinventano il conflitto», Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio. doi: 10.4396/20240611A.