Autorità e accomodamento

  • Laura Caponetto
Parole chiave: Accommodation, Presuppositions, Authority, Speech Acts, Felicity Conditions

Abstract

“Authority” is said in many ways. Formal authority – i.e. authority conferred through official appointment – is one such way. Informal authority is another. Rae Langton (2015, 2018a, 2018b) has recently argued that speakers can acquire informal authority via presupposition accommodation: a speaker acts as if they had authority over their hearer, and they can come to acquire that authority if nobody objects. This paper explores the reversed pattern. I argue that speakers sometimes act as if their hearer had authority over them – which gives the hearer a chance to grab that authority ‘in the moment’. After defending the philosophical plausibility of this claim, I address some of its moral and societal implications. In closing, I broaden the picture by maintaining that accommodation may supply felicity conditions other than the authority condition. It thus plays a greater role in illocutionary success than traditionally acknowledged.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Adams, N.P. (2020), «Authority, Illocutionary Accommodation, and Social Accommodation», in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, n. 98(3), pp. 560-573.

Austin, J.L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words, Clarendon Press, Oxford (Come fare cose con le parole, a cura di M. Sbisà e C. Penco, Marietti, Genova 1987).

Bianchi, C., Caponetto, L. (a cura di) (2020), Linguaggio d’odio e autorità, Mimesis, Milano.

Caponetto, L. (2017), «On Silencing, Authority, and the Act of Refusal», in Rivista di estetica, n. 64(1), pp. 35-52.

Caponetto, L. (2020), Contestazione illocutoria e riduzione al silenzio, in C. Bianchi e L. Caponetto, a cura di, Linguaggio d’odio e autorità, Mimesis, Milano, pp. 105-124.

Cowart, M. (2004), «Understanding Acts of Consent: Using Speech Act Theory to Help Resolve Moral Dilemmas and Legal Disputes», in Law and Philosophy, n. 23, pp. 495-525.

Fintel, K. von (2004), «Would you Believe it? The King of France is Back! (Presuppositions and Truth-Value Intuitions)», in M. Reimer e A. Bezuidenhout, a cura di, Descriptions and Beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 315-341.

Fintel, K. von (2008), «What is Presupposition Accommodation, Again?», in Philosophical Perspectives, n. 22, pp. 137-170.

Lance, M., Kukla, R. (2013), «Leave the Gun; Take the Cannoli! The Pragmatic Topography of Second-Person Calls», in Ethics, n. 123, pp. 456-478.

Langton, R. (2015), «How to Get a Norm from a Speech Act», in The Amherst Lecture in Philosophy, n. 10, pp. 1-33.

Langton, R. (2017), «Is Pornography Like the Law?», in M. Mikkola, a cura di, Beyond Speech. Pornography and Analytic Feminist Philosophy, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 23-38.

Langton, R. (2018a), «The Authority of Hate Speech», in J. Gardner, L. Green, B. Leiter, a cura di, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, vol. 3, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 123-152 (L’autorità del linguaggio d’odio, trad. it. di L. Caponetto, in C. Bianchi e L. Caponetto, a cura di, Linguaggio d’odio e autorità, Mimesis, Milano 2020, pp. 23-62).

Langton, R. (2018b), Blocking as Counter-Speech, in D. Fogal, D.W. Harris, M. Moss, a cura di, New Work on Speech Acts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 144-164.

Lewis, D. (1979), «Scorekeeping in a Language Game», in Journal of Philosophical Logic, n. 8(3), pp. 339-359.

Maitra, I. (2012), Subordinating Speech, in I. Maitra e M. K. McGowan, a cura di, Speech and Harm. Controversies over Free Speech, Oxford University Press, Oxford , pp. 94-120.

Raz, J. (1999), Practical Reason and Norms, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Raz, J. (2009), The Authority of Law. Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Sbisà, M. (2002), «Speech Acts in Context», in Language and Communication, n. 22, pp. 421-436.

Schlosser, M. (2019), Agency, in E.N. Zalta, a cura di, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2019 Edition, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/ agency/.

Searle, J.R. (1975), A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts, in K. Gunderson, a cura di, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. VII, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 344-369 (Per una tassonomia degli atti illocutori, trad. it. di A. Cattani e M. Zorino, in M. Sbisà, a cura di, Gli atti linguistici. Aspetti e problemi di filosofia del linguaggio, Feltrinelli, Milano 1978, pp. 168-188).

Searle, J.R., Vanderveken, D. (1985), Foundations of Illocutionary Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Stalnaker, R. (1973), «Presuppositions», in Journal of Philosophical Logic, n. 2(4), pp. 447-457.

Thomason, R.H. (1990), Accommodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics, in P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan, M.E. Pollack, a cura di, Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 325-364.

Witek, M. (2013), How to Establish Authority with Words: Imperative Utterances and Presupposition Accommodation, in A. Brożek, a cura di, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at Warsaw University, vol. 7, Semper, Warsaw, pp. 145-157.

Pubblicato
2022-09-17
Come citare
Caponetto, L. (2022) «Autorità e accomodamento», Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio. doi: 10.4396/SFL2021A32.