Teorie dell’argomentazione e scelte democratiche. Una critica interna al dibattito italiano / Argumentation Theory and Democratic Choices. Criticizing the Italian Debate from the Inside
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the relationship among the argumentation theory, its fallacies and democratic choices by reference to public contests. Firstly, the aim will be pursued in accordance with what has been suggested in the Italian debate by Franca D’Agostini and Paola Cantù. In nutshell, the main thesis proposed by the authors holds that the argumentation theory might have an influence on the electors’ opinion and, consequently, might condition their democratic choices. All this considered, in the second place, the limits of that perspective will be pointed out and its grounding assumptions will be critically discussedRiferimenti bibliografici
CANTÙ, Paola (2011), E qui casca l’asino. Errori di ragionamento nel dibattito pubblico, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
CARNAP, Rudolf (1950), «Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology», in Revue internationale de philosophie, n. 4, pp. 20-40.
D’AGOSTINI, Franca (2010), Verità avvelenata. Buoni e cattivi argomenti nel dibattito pubblico, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
GENOVESE, Rino (2013), Un illuminismo autocritico, Rosenberg & Sellier, Torino.
HAACK, Susan (1976), «Some Preliminaries to Ontology», in Journal of Philosophical Logic, n. 5, pp. 457-474.
QUINE, W.V.O. (1951), «On Carnap’s Views on Ontology», in Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, v. 2, n. 5, pp. 65-72.
TAMBASSI, Timothy (2011), «Epistemologia e teoria sociale. Questioni interne ed esterne», in La società degli individui, n. 42, pp. 46-52.
TAMBASSI, Timothy (2015), «Giustizia, relativismo, utopia», in Quaderni della Ginestra, n. 15, pp. 11-14, disponibile su http://www.la-ginestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Tambassi-scar.pdf.
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.