Practicing epideictic today: paradoxical encomium in secondary school
Abstract
The fact that epideictic aims at building a consensus, a “homonoia” among a community is well established since the first known rhetorical treatises. Making students exercise this rhetorical genre would then probably be of great interest to our society. I was teaching Latin and Greek in Belgian secondary schools during four years and decided to explore this hypothesis by making my students practice epideictic exercises. For they constitute the main model that may inspire us today, I took inspiration from exercises as they were practiced during classical Antiquity. After taking into account theoretical and practical aspects inherent to my teaching area, I decided to work on the so called ‘paradoxical encomium’. My students were then asked to write the encomium of a neutral, or blameworthy object or person. This paper presents the results of this experiment.
I will here focus on the concrete practice of such exercises, on the basis of my own teaching experience. I will broach benefits, but also technical and ethical problems that teachers and students may encounter while practicing them in a nowadays classroom and will illustrate my purpose with examples of productions written by some of my students, from 15 to 17 years old, in a Brussels school of the general secondary education in 2015.Riferimenti bibliografici
BERNARD, Jacques-Emmanuel (2000), Le portrait chez Tite-Live. Essai sur une écriture de l’histoire romaine, Latomus, Brussels
CLO, Magdeleine (2013), «Les LCA pour mieux se connaître?», in Cahiers pédagogiques 32, pp. 60-61.
DANDREY, Patrick (1997), L'éloge paradoxal de Gorgias à Molière, , P.U.F., Paris
DELLANOY, Jean (2013), «Les lettres anciennes et l’éducation nouvelle», in Cahiers pédagogiques 32, pp. 58-59.
DUBUISSON, Michel (1985), «La vision romaine de l’étranger. Stéréotypes, idéologie et mentalités», in Cahiers de Clio, n° 81, pp. 82-98.
DURU-BELLAT, Marie and VAN ZANTEN, Agnès, 2012, Sociologie de l’école, Armand Colin, Paris.
FERRY, Victor and SANS, Benoît (2015a), Educating Rhetorical Consciousness in Argumentation, in ANDRE, Jo-Anne (ed), CASDW 2014 Proceedings (online).
FERRY, Victor and SANS, Benoît (2015b), Introduction: éduquer le regard rhétorique, in FERRY, Victor and SANS, Benoît (eds), Rhétorique et citoyenneté. Exercices de rhétorique 5 (online).
HORNBLOWER, Simon and al. (1994), Greek Historiography, At Clarendon Press, Oxford.
KENNEDY, George (1972), The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, Princeton University Press, Princeton .
LAGARRIGUE, Jacques (2001), L’école. Le retour des valeurs? Des enseignants témoignent, De Boeck, Bruxelles.
MARINCOLA, John (2001),Greek Historians, Cambridge University Press, Oxford.
NUSSBAUM, Martha (2010), Not for profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, Princeton university press, Princeton.
PERNOT, Laurent (1993), La rhétorique de l’éloge dans le monde gréco-romain, 2 vol., Institut d’études augustiniennes, Paris.
PERNOT, Laurent (2000), La rhétorique dans l’Antiquité, Livre de Poche, Paris.
PEPE, Cristina (2013), The Genres of Rhetorical Speeches in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Brill, Leiden - Boston.
RUSSELL, Donald Andrew and WILSON, Nigel Guy (1981), Menander Rhetor. A Commentary, Edited with translation and commentary by D. A. R. and N. G. W., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
SANS, Benoît (2012), Narratio probabilis: étude comparée des systèmes rhétoriques de Polybe et Tite-Live (thèse de doctorat), Brussels.
SANS, Benoît (2015), Enseigner le genre épidictique, in FERRY Victor and DI PIAZZA Salvatore (eds), Les rhétoriques de la concorde, (online).
VANHALME, Charlotte (2012), Citoyenneté postmoderne et didactique des langues anciennes: quel projet d'autonomie intellectuelle pour l'apprenant?, Université libre de Bruxelles, PhD thesis Bruxelles.
VANHALME, Charlotte (2013), «Apprendre l’altérite: un détour obligé par la complexité», in Cahiers pédagogiques n. 32, pp. 74-77.
VERDELHAN-BOUGARDE, Michèle (2001), École, langage et citoyenneté, L’Harmattan, Paris.
VIX, Jean-Paul (2010), L’enseignement de la rhétorique au IIe siècle ap. J.-C. à travers les discours 30-34 d’Aelius Aristide, Brepols, Turnhout.
WEBB, Ruth (2001), The Progymnasmata as Practice, in TOO Yun Lee (ed), Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Brill, Leyde - London - Cologne.
WISEMAN, Timothy Peter (1979), Clio’s Cosmetics : Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature, Leicester University Press, Leicester - Totowa.
WISEMAN, Timothy Peter (1993), Lying Historians : Seven Types of Mendacity, in GILL Christoper and WISEMAN Timothy Peter (eds) Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, pp. 122-146.
WOODMAN, Anthony J. (1988), Rhetoric in Classical Historiography. Fourth Studies, Aeropagitica Press, London - Sydney.
Quest'opera è distribuita con Licenza Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
