Brain versus body? Phrenological neuromania yesterday and today

Authors

  • Alice Orrù

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4396/202521

Keywords:

neuromania, 19th-century phrenology, embodiment, cognitive semiotic, association of ideas

Abstract

The trend of Neuromania (roughly, the brain tells us who we are) has its roots in the 19th-century phrenological approach developed by F.J. Gall and J.G. Spurzheim. Their initial intentions were embraced, a century and a half later, by some proponents of first-generation cognitive science. J.A. Fodor’s modular theory of mind and localization of different brain functions reflects Gall’s idea of a close “brain-mind(-body)” correlation, determining moral sentiments and intellectual faculties. Then as now, such a perspective inevitably leads to several risks: 1) an extreme scientificalization of domains outside scientific calculations (e.g., that of feelings and perceptions); 2) the hierarchization between more or less functional faculties which human beings would possess (deviating, e.g., into the legal sphere); 3) the possibility of detecting all this by studying the brain alone. So, the 19th-century phrenological quarrel both anticipated and clarified today’s contention. Concerning the anti-phrenological side, G.F.W. Hegel’s embodied approach and C. Cattaneo’s concept of association of ideas derived from perception (i.e., cognitive semiotic ante litteram), provide a key to addressing the above issues and proposing remedies to neuromaniac deviations in their various forms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achella, Stefania (2021), «Disembodied idealism? A new reading of Hegel», in Teoria. Rivista Di Filosofia, vol. 41, n. 1, pp. 53-70, https://doi.org/10.4454/teoria.v41i1.119.

Canziani, G., Cattaneo, C. (1839), «Della frenologia. Lettera del Cav. Giuseppe Frank», in Il Politecnico. Repertorio mensile di studi applicati alla prosperità e coltura sociale, serie 1, vol. 2, (July 1839), pp. 67-87.

Cattaneo, Carlo (1960), Scritti filosofici, eds. Norberto Bobbio, vols. 1-3, Le Monnier, Firenze.

Cattaneo, Carlo (2016 [1859-1866]), Psicologia delle menti associate, Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, Milano (Psychology of the Associated Minds, transl. by D. Gibbons, Bocconi University Press, EGEA, Milan, 2019, E-pub).

Chomsky, Noam (1980), Rules and Representations, Columbia University Press, New York, 2005.

Cicero (1927), Tusculan Disputations, transl. by J. E. King, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1960.

Cosmacini, Giorgio (1993), Cattaneo, Gall e la frenologia, in Colombo Arturo, Montaleone Carlo, eds., Cattaneo e il Politecnico. Scienza, cultura, modernità, Franco Angeli, Milano, pp. 267-274.

Eco, Umberto (1984), Il linguaggio del volto, in Eco Umberto, Sugli specchi e altri saggi, Bompiani, Milano, 1985, pp. 45-54.

Egeland, Jonathan (2024), «Making sense of the modularity debate», in New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 75, 101108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2024.101108.

Eling, P., Finger, S. (2021), eds., Gall, Spurzheim, and the phrenological movement. Insights and perspectives, Routledge, New York.

Fodor, Jerry A. (1983), The modularity of mind, A Bradford Book/The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Gall, F. J., Spurzheim, J. G. (1810-1819), Anatomie et physiologies du système nerveux en general, et du cerveau en particulier, vols. 1-4 with an atlas, Schoell, Paris.

Hegel, Georg W. F. (1807), Phänomenologie des Geistes, Bamberg and Würzburg, Joseph Anton Goebhardt (The Phenomenology of Spirit, transl. by M. Inwood, Oxford University Press, New York, 2018).

Inwood, Michael (2016), Hegel’s critique of physiognomy and phrenology, in Herrmann-Sinai Susanne, Ziglioli Lucia, eds., Hegel’s philosophical psychology, Routledge, New York, pp. 3-19.

Legrenzi, P., Umiltà, C. (2009), Neuro-mania. Il cervello non spiega chi siamo, Il Mulino, Bologna (Neuromania. On the Limits of Brain Science, transl. by F. Anderson, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 2011).

Leone, Massimo (2023), Introduction, in Leone Massimo, Giuliana Gianmarco Thierry, eds., Sémiotique du visage futur, Aracne, Roma, pp. 9-18.

Marshall, John C. (1980), «The New Organology (Commentary on Chomsky’s Rules and Representations)», in The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3(1), pp. 23-25.

Mijuskovic, Ben Lazare (2019), Consciousness and Loneliness. Theoria and Praxis, Brill Rodopi, Leiden/Boston.

Pogliano, Claudio (2020), Brain and Race. A History of Cerebral Anthropology, Brill, Leiden-Boston.

Renneville, Marc (2021), «Neurosciences et spectre du neuro-déterminisme. Perspective historique», in Mission de recherche Droit et Justice et ENM, Neurosciences et pratiques judiciaires. Acte du colloque pluridisciplinaires des 18 et 19 mai 2021, pp. 21-25.

Sizer, Nelson (1882), Forty years in phrenology: embracing recollections of history, anecdote, and experience, Fowler & Wells Company, New York.

Sonesson, Göran (2007), From the meaning of embodiment to the embodiment of meaning: A study in phenomenological semiotics, in Ziemke Tom, Zlatev Jordan, Frank Roslyn M., eds., Body, Language and Mind, Volume 1: Embodiment, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, pp. 85-127.

Sonesson, Göran (2018), New Reflections On The Problem(S) Of Relevance(S). The Return Of The Phenomena: Theories, Factors and Challenges, in Strassheim Jan, Nasu Hisashi, eds., Relevance and Irrelevance: Theories, Factors and Challenges, Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin-Boston, pp. 21-50, doi:10.1515/9783110472509-002.

Tallis, Raymond (2011), Aping Mankind. Neuromania, Darwinitis and the Misrepresentation of Humanity, Acumen, Durham.

Zlatev, Jordan (2015), Cognitive Semiotics, in Trifonas Peter P., eds, International Handbook of Semiotics, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 1043-1067.

Zlatev, J., Mendoza-Collazos, J. (2022), «A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Agency: Assessing Ideas from Cognitive Science and Neuroscience», in Biosemiotics, vol. 15, pp. 141-170, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-022-09473-z.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-05

How to Cite

Orrù, A. . (2026) “Brain versus body? Phrenological neuromania yesterday and today”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 19(2). doi: 10.4396/202521.