Lo scetticismo sullo scetticismo o sull’idea stessa di un ‘linguaggio della vasca’ globale

  • Genia Schönbaumsfeld
Keywords: Scepticism, Closure-based sceptical argument, Local sceptical scenario, Global sceptical scenario, Recent envatment, Lifelong envatment, Private language, Wittgenstein

Abstract

This paper aims to motivate a scepticism about scepticism in contemporary epistemology. I present the sceptic with a dilemma: On one parsing of the BIV (brain-in-a-vat) scenario, the second premise in a closure-based sceptical argument will turn out false, because the scenario is refutable; on another parsing, the scenario collapses into incoherence, because the sceptic cannot even save the appearances. I discuss three different ways of cashing out the BIV scenario: ‘Recent Envatment’ (RE), ‘Lifelong Envatment’ (LE) and ‘Nothing But Envatment’ (NBE). I show that RE scenarios are a kind of ’local’ sceptical scenario that does not pose a significant threat to the possibility of perceptual knowledge as such. I then go on to consider the more radical (or global) LE and NBE scenarios, which do undermine the possibility of perceptual knowledge of an ‘external’ world by positing that it is conceivable that one has always been envatted and, hence, trapped in a ‘global’ illusion. I start by assuming that we could be in such a scenario (LE or NBE) and then spell out what we would need to presuppose for such scenarios to be capable of being actual. Drawing on some central insights from Wittgenstein’s anti- private language considerations, I show that the truth of a global scepticism would presuppose the possibility of a private ‘vat-language’, a notion that cannot be rendered coherent. But, if so, then neither can the sceptical scenarios that presuppose such a conception.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayer, Alfred J. (1971), Could language be invented by a Robinson Crusoe?, in Jones O., a cura di, The private language argument, Macmillan, London, pp. 50-61.

Baker Gordon, Hacker Peter M. S. (1984), Scepticism, rules and language, Blackwell, Oxford.

Coliva, Annalisa (2014), Moderatism, transmission failures, closure and humean scepticism, in Dodd D., Zardini E., a cura di, Scepticism and perceptual justification, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 248–276.

Coliva, Annalisa (2015), Extended rationality: a hinge epistemology, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Dretske, Fred (1969), Seeing and knowing, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Dretske, Fred (2010), Epistemological self-portrait, in Dancy, J., Sosa, E., Steup, M., a cura di, A companion to epistemology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 130–133.

Fogelin, Robert (1987), Wittgenstein. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

Goldstein, Irwin (1996), Ontology, epistemology, and private ostensive definition, in Philosophy Phenomenological Research, 56(1):137-147.

Hawthorne, John (2005), The case for closure, in Sosa, E., Steup, M., a cura di, A companion to epistemology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 26-42.

Hervey, H. (1971), Private language and private sensations, in Jones O. R., a cura di, The private language argument, Macmillan, London, pp. 76-95.

Horwich, Paul (2012), Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Jarvis Thomson, Judith (1971), The verification principle and the private language argument, in Jones O. R., a cura di, The private language argument, Macmillan, London, pp. 183-204.

Kenny, Anthony (2006), Wittgenstein, Blackwell, Oxford (Wittgenstein, Trad. it. di Enrico Moriconi, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 2016).

Kripke, Saul (1982), Wittgenstein on rules and private language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Wittgenstein su regole e linguaggio privato, Trad. it. di Marco Santambrogio, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 2000).

Kusch, Martin (2006), A sceptical guide to meaning and rules, Acumen, Chesham.

McDowell, John (1998), Knowledge and the Internal. Meaning, knowledge and reality, Harvard University Press, pp. 395-413.

McDowell, John (2002), Wittgenstein on following a rule, in Miller A, Wright C, a cura di, Rule-following and meaning, Routledge, London, pp. 45-80.

Mundle, Clement W. K. (1971), Behaviourism and the private language argument, in Jones O. R., a cura di, The private language argument, Macmillan, London, pp. 103-117.

Neta, Ram, Pritchard, David (2007), McDowell and the new evil genius, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74, pp. 381-396.

Pritchard, David (2012), Epistemological disjunctivism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Putnam, Hilary (1981), Reason, truth and history, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Putnam, Hilary (2002), The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Rhees, Rush (1971), ‘Private experience’ and ‘sense data’, in Jones O. R., a cura di, The private language argument, Macmillan, London, pp. 229-232.

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia (2016), The illusion of doubt, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia (2019), Epistemic angst, intellectual courage and radical scepticism, International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9(3):206-222.

Sellars, Wilfrid (1956/1997), Empiricism and the philosophy of mind, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (Empirismo e filosofia della mente, Trad. it. Elisabetta Sacchi, Einaudi, Torino, 2004).

Strawson, Peter F. (1971), Exposition and criticism of Wittgenstein’s Investigations, in Jones O. R., a cura di, The private language argument, Macmillan, London, pp. 27-33.

Stroud, Barry (1984), The significance of philosophical scepticism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Stroud, Barry (2000), Wittgenstein on meaning, understanding and community, in Stroud B., a cura di, Meaning, understanding and practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 80-94.

White, Roger (2014), What is my evidence that here is a hand?, in Dodd D, Zardini E., a cura di, Scepticism and perceptual justification, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 298-321.

Wiggins, David (1980), Sameness and substance, Blackwell, Oxford

Wright, Crispin (2008), Comment on John McDowell, in Haddock A, Macpherson F, a cura di, Disjunctivism: perception, action, knowledge, Oxford University Press, pp. 390-404.

Wright, Crispin (2014), On epistemic entitlement (II): welfare state epistemology, in Dodd D, Zardini E, a cura di, Scepticism and perceptual justification, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 213-247

Wittgenstein, Ludvig (1965), The blue and brown books, Harper and Row, New York (Libro blu e Libro marrone, Einaudi, Torino, 2000).

Wittgenstein, Ludvig (1969), On certainty, Blackwell, Oxford (Della certezza, trad. it. Mario Trinchero, Einaudi, Torino, 1999).

Wittgenstein, Ludvig (1975), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus e Quaderni 1914-16, trad. it. Amedeo Conte, Einaudi, Torino, 2009).

Wittgenstein, Ludvig (1953), Philosophical investigations, Blackwell, Oxford (Ricerche filosofiche, trad. it. Mario Trinchero, Einaudi, Torino, 1967).

Published
2025-02-26
How to Cite
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2025) “Lo scetticismo sullo scetticismo o sull’idea stessa di un ‘linguaggio della vasca’ globale”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 18(2). doi: 10.4396/202427.