Chomsky and Lakoff: from cognition to language and politics, and back

  • Filomena Diodato
Keywords: Noam Chomsky, George Lakoff, Political language, Political cognition, Political communication

Abstract

The paper aims to compare two distant yet close conceptions of politics and political communication, that of Noam Chomsky, which matured since the second half of the last century, and that of George Lakoff, which came into vogue between the 1990s and 2000s. Chomsky and Lakoff are the heroes of the Linguistics Wars which redefined the physiognomy of US linguistics and cognitive science and also personify, each in his way, the figure of a public intellectual. Nevertheless, dealing with politics and communication, both fail to untangle the link between cognition, language, and propaganda: Chomsky moves, albeit contradictory, from heaven to earth, i.e., from the scientific investigation of language and mind to the non-scientific realm of historical events, whose analysis is entrusted to the citizen endowed with a Cartesian common-sense; Lakoff takes, instead, the reverse path, outlining a political mind that embrains the ideologies and consequently proposing cognitive activism which aims at reframing people’s brain. Both approaches flow into an outdated, reductionist communication model, entailed in both first and second-generation cognitive science, which does not ponder the complexity of political and communicative practices enacted by semiotic-political animals.

References

Allen Harris, Randy (1993), The Linguistic Wars. Chomsky, Lakoff, and the Battle over the Deep Structure, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Arnove, Anthony (2008), Foreword, in Chomsky Noam, Arnove, Anthony, eds., The Essential Chomsky, The New Press, New York-London, pp. 10-14.

Barsky, Robert F. (2007), The Chomsky Effect. A Radical Works Beyond the Ivory Tower, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Berlin, Heather A. (2011), «The neural basis of the dynamic unconscious», in Neuropsychoanalysis, vol. 13, n. 1, pp. 5-31.

Berwick, Robert C.; Chomsky, Noam (2016), Why Only Us? Language and Evolution, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

Chomsky, Noam (1966a), Cartesian Linguistic. A Charter in the History of Rationalist Thought, Harper & Row, New York-London.

Chomsky, Noam (1966b), The responsibility of intellectuals, a revised version of a talk given at Harvard and published in Mosaic, June 1966, in Chomsky Noam, The Essential Chomsky, ed. by, Arnove Anthony, The New Press, New York-London 2008, pp. 85-129.

Chomsky, Noam (1970), Notes of Anarchism, a revised version of the introduction to Daniel Guérin’s Anarchism: From Theory to Practice, New York, Monthly Review Press, in Chomsky Noam, The Essential Chomsky, ed. by, Arnove Anthony, The New Press, New York-London 2008, pp. 184-207.

Chomsky, Noam (1975), Reflections on Language, Pantheon Books, New York.

Chomsky, Noam (1976a), Politics, repr. in Chomsky Noam, Foucault, Michel 2006 (cfr. infra), pp. 68-116.

Chomsky, Noam (1976b), The philosophy of language, repr. in Chomsky Noam, Foucault Michel 2006 (cfr. infra), pp. 117-139.

Chomsky, Noam (1978), Foreign Policy and the Intelligentsia, in “Human Rights” and American Foreign Policy, Spokesman, Nottingham, repr. in Chomsky Noam, The Essential Chomsky, ed. by, Arnove Anthony, The New Press, New York-London 2008, pp. 311-362.

Chomsky, Noam (1989), Containing the enemy, in Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies, South End Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 21-43, repr. in Chomsky Noam, The Essential Chomsky, ed. by, Arnove Anthony, The New Press, New York-London 2008, pp. 490-527.

Chomsky, Noam (1996), «Noam Chomsky on Anarchism, Marxism & Hope for the Future», special interview in Red & Black Revolution, 2.

Chomsky, Noam (2002a), On Nature and Language, ed. by, Belletti Adriana, Rizzi Luigi, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA.

Chomsky, Noam (2002b), Understanding power, The Indispensable Chomsky, ed. by, Mitchell Peter R., Schoeffel John, The New Press, New York.

Chomsky, Noam (2006), Language and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA.

Chomsky, Noam (1983), «Mental Representations», in Syracuse Scholar (1979-1991), vol. 4, n. 2, Article 2 from https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1162&context=suscholar

Chomsky, Noam; Foucault, Michel (2006), The Chomsky-Foucault Debate. On human nature, The New Press, New York-London.

Coseriu, Eugenio (1987), Lenguaje y política, in El lenguaje político, ed. por, Manuel Alvar, Fundación Friedrich Ebert, Madrid, pp. 9-31, from https://coseriu.ch/wp-content/uploads/publications_coseriu/coseriu226.pdf

Damasio, Antonio (1994), Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York.

De Mauro, Tullio (1965), Introduzione alla semantica, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

De Mauro, Tullio (1982), Minisemantica dei linguaggi non verbali e delle lingue, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

Diodato, Filomena (2020), «The embodiment of language: sign function and semiotic threshold», in RIFL. SFL: Language and Emotions, pp. 203-215.

Ferretti, Andrea (2022), «Alle origini dell’‘opinione pubblica’: Le Bon e il ruolo dei segni nel governo delle folle», in Prismi, Quaderni del Dottorato in Scienze documentarie, linguistiche e letterarie, Ledizioni, Milano, pp. 239-253.

Ferretti, Andrea (2023), Ideologia della “propaganda” e propaganda “delle ideologie”. Critica del paradigma psico-sociologico e proposte semiotiche per lo studio della “comunicazione politica”, tesi di dottorato in Scienze Documentarie, Linguistiche e Letterarie (XXXV Ciclo), Dipartimento di Lettere e Culture Moderne, Sapienza, Università di Roma.

Freeden, Michael (2003), Ideology. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Fukujama, Francis (1992), The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press, New York.

Gallese, Vittorio; Lakoff, George (2005), «The Brain’s Concepts: The Role Of The Sensory-Motor System In Conceptual Knowledge», in Cognitive Neuropsychology, vol. 22, n. 3/4, pp. 455-479.

Gallie, Walter B. (1956), «Essentially Contested Concepts» in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 56, pp. 167-198.

Gazzaniga, Michael S. (1998), The mind’s past, University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles.

Hauser, Marc D.; Chomsky, Noam; Fitch, Tecumseh W. (2002), «The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?», in Science, vol. 298, n. 5598, pp. 1569-1579.

Hazen, Don (2004), Introduction, in Lakoff George, ed. by, Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River junction VT, pp. XI-XIV.

Itkonen, Esa (2008), The central role of normativity in language and linguistics, in Zlatev Jordan, Racine Timothy P., Sinha Chris, Itkonen Esa, ed by, The Shared Mind. Perspectives on intersubjectivity, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, pp. 279-305.

Kihlstrom, John F.; Barnhardt, Terrence M.; Tataryn, Douglas J. (1992), «The psychological unconscious: found, lost, and regained», in American Psychologist, vol. 47, pp. 788-791.

Lakoff, George (1987), Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lakoff, George (2004), Don’t Think of an Elephant!. Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River junction VT.

Lakoff, George (2006), The Political Mind. A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics, Penguin Books, New York.

Lakoff, George; Mark, Johnson (1980), Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lakoff, George; Mark, Johnson (1999), Philosophy in the flesh, Basic Books, New York.

Leezenberg, Michiel (2009), «From Cognitive Linguistics to Social Science: Thirty Years after Metaphors We Live By», in Cognitive Semiotics, vol. 5, n. 1-2, pp. 140-152.

Leuzinger-Bohleber, Marianne; Arnold, Simon; Solms, Mark (2016), The Unconscious. A bridge between psychoanalysis and cognitive neuroscience, Routledge, London-New York.

Ponzio, Augusto (1973), Produzione linguistica e ideologica sociale: per una teoria marxista del linguaggio e della comunicazione, De Donato, Bari (new edition 2006, B.A. Graphis, Bari).

Ponzio, Augusto (1982), Presupposti ideologici della teoria saussuriana e della teoria chomskyana del linguaggio, in Gambarara Daniele, D’Atri Annabella, a cura di, Ideologia, Filosofia e Linguistica, Atti del convegno internazionale di studi Rende (CS), 15-17 settembre 1978, Bulzoni, Roma.

Rossi-Landi, Ferruccio (1978), Ideologia, Bompiani, Milano.

Sonesson, Göran (2007), From the meaning of embodiment to the embodiment of meaning: A study in phenomenological semiotic, in Ziemke Tom, Zlatev Jordan, Frank Roslyn M., ed. by, Body, Language and Mind, Vol. 1 Embodiment, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin-New York, pp. 85-128.

Spivey, Michael (2006), The Continuity of Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Stephanson, Anders (1995), Manifest Destiny: American Expansionism and the Empire of Right, Hill and Wang, New York.

Talvitie, Vesa (2009), Freudian Unconscious and Cognitive Neuroscience. From Unconscious Fantasies to Neural Algorithms, Routledge, London.

Published
2023-10-02
How to Cite
Diodato, F. (2023) “Chomsky and Lakoff: from cognition to language and politics, and back”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio. doi: 10.4396/2022SFL06.