Science and metaphysics. Immanence and transcendence of language

  • Luigi Bruno
Keywords: language, science, metaphysics, immanence, transcendence, possibility

Abstract

Science and metaphysics, as speech about the world, are also based on the only tool available to all possible speeches, language. They therefore arise in an inter-disciplinary context in which it seems that none of them can have any ambition of greater credibility or paradigmatic precedence towards the other forms of knowledge. Therefore, an analysis of the relationship between science and metaphysics must start from the consideration of language as a conditioning form that precedes any access to reality, be it scientific or philosophical. The necessary presupposition of language is prior to any scientific (and gnoseological) theory or approach, because it precedes any constitution of the subject, which is feasible only starting from the referential and intersubjective use of language, which allows man to constitute himself as a subject and, as such, to place himself in the world. The present investigation addresses the relationship between immanence and transcendence of language, from which derives a theoretical framework of reference for a possible and serene dialogue between the two speeches, in which these are interpreted, not as a dominion, but as a tension, of science towards immanence, recognizing the founding event of the being of things; of metaphysics towards transcendence, presupposing the empirical datum of entities. This would entail a reciprocal openness which, on the political level, rediscovers a fruitful collaboration that excludes any form of coercion and tyranny on the part of a single thought, that is, founded as absolute, incapable of giving answers to everything that is outside its dominion.

References

Agazzi, Evandro (1960), Sulla scientificità della filosofia, in Atti del XII Congresso di Filosofia, vol. V, Sansoni, Firenze 1960.

Carnap, Rudolf (1932), «Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache», in Erkenntnis, II, pp. 219-241.

Cassirer, Ernst (1923), Philosophie der symbolischen Formen. Teil 1: Die Sprache, Bruno Cassirer Verlag, Berlin (Filosofia delle forme simboliche. Il linguaggio, vol. I, trad. it. di M.G. Brega, Edizioni Ghibli, Milano 2018).

Cassirer, Ernst (1956), Wesen und Wirkung des Symbolbegriffs, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

Dal Lago, Alessandro (2011), L’etica della debolezza, in Vattimo, Gianni e Rovatti, Aldo (2011) (eds), Il pensiero debole, Feltrinelli, Milano, pp. 91-119.

Diodato, Filomena (2012), La comunicazione tra discorso e testo, in Gensini, Stefano (2012) (ed.), Filosofie della comunicazione, Carocci, Roma, pp. 73-101.

Eco, Umberto (2011), L’antiporfirio, in Vattimo, Gianni e Rovatti, Aldo (2011) (eds), Il pensiero debole, Feltrinelli, Milano, pp. 52-80.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1960), Wahrheit und Methode, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen (Verità e metodo, trad. it. di G. Vattimo, Bompiani, Milano 2000).

Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1987), «Testo e interpretazione», in Aut aut, nn. 217-218, pp. 31-41.

Gensini, Stefano (2012) (ed.), Filosofie della comunicazione, Carocci, Roma, 2012.

Gigliotti, Gianna (1995), «Cassirer e il trascendentale kantiano», in Rivista di storia della filosofia (1984-) 50, no. 4, pp. 785–808.

Gili, Guido (2005), La credibilità. Quando e perché la comunicazione ha successo, Rubbettino, Catanzaro 2005.

Heidegger, Martin (1930), Vom Wesen der Wahrheit, Frankfurt am Main, Klosterman (L’essenza della verità, trad. it. di F. Volpi – H. Mörchen, Adelphi, Milano 1997).

Heidegger, Martin (1943), Nachwort zu «Was ist Metaphysik?», in Id., Was ist Metaphysik?, Frankfurt am Main, Klosterman (Poscritto a «Che cos’è la metafisica?», trad. it. di F. Volpi, Adelphi, Milano 2001).

Heidegger, Martin (1947), Platons Lehre von der Wahrheit. Mit einem Brief über den Humanismus, Francke, Bern (Lettera sull’«umanismo», trad. it. di F. Volpi, Adelphi, Milano 1995).

Heidegger, Martin (1953), Die Frage nach der Technik, in Vorträge und Aufsätze, Neske, Pfullingen (trad. it. La questione della tecnica, in Saggi e discorsi, Mursia, Milano 1976, pp. 5-27).

Humboldt, Wilhelm von (1836), Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues (Einleitung zum Kawi-Werk), in Wilhelm von Humboldt’s Gesammelte Schriften, a cura di A. Leitzmann et alii, Behr, Berlin 1903-1936 (rist. De Gruyter, Berlin 1967/68), vol. VII, pp. 1-344.

Kant, Immanuel (1781), Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, I ed. Hartknoch, Riga; II ed. Hartknoch, Riga 1787 (Critica della ragion pura, trad. it. di G. Colli, Adelphi, Milano, 1976).

Koyré, Alexandre (1973), Etudes d’histoire de la pensée scientifique, Gallimard, Paris.

Locke, John (1690), An essay concerning humane understanding, Basset, London 1690 (Saggio sull’intelletto umano, trad. it. di C. Motzo Dentice di Accadia, RCS Libri – Fabbri Editori, Milano 1996).

Marconi, Diego (2011), Wittgenstein e le ruote che girano a vuoto, in Vattimo, Gianni e Rovatti, Aldo (2011) (eds), Il pensiero debole, Feltrinelli, Milano, pp. 164-180.

Parmanide, Sulla natura, trad. it. di G. Reale, Rusconi, Milano, 1998.

Polanyi, Michael (1962), Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Routledge, London (I ed. 1958); (La conoscenza personale. Verso una filosofia post-critica, trad. it. di E. Riverso, Rusconi, Milano 1990).

Popper, Karl R. (1962), Conjectures and refutations, Basic Books, New York, (Cogetture e confutazioni, trad. it. di G. Pancaldi, Fabbri Editori, Milano 1996).

Strumia, Alberto (1992), Introduzione alla filosofia della scienze, ESD, Bologna.

Tani, Ilaria (2012), La svolta comunicativa e le trasformazioni del kantismo: Apel e Habermas, in Gensini, Stefano (2012) (ed.) , Filosofie della comunicazione, Carocci, Roma, pp. 187-222.

Tyn, Tomas (1960), Metafisica della sostanza, ESD, Bologna 1991.

Valentini, Tommaso (2017), «Il trascendentale come forma linguistica e storica: la proposta teoretica di Ernst Cassirer», in Aretè. International Journal of Philosophy, Human & Social Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 154-191.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1977), Vermischte Bemerkungen, Suhrkamp Verlag, Francoforte (Pensieri diversi, trad. it. di M. Ranchetti, Fabbri Editori, Milano 1996).

Published
2023-07-19
How to Cite
Bruno, L. (2023) “Science and metaphysics. Immanence and transcendence of language”, Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 17(1). doi: 10.4396/06202302.