The Folding Conversation of Cinema
For decays, cinema is considered as the practice of signs and images within the trajectory of linguistic sign functioning. Even though deciphering cinematic art in such a framework can explain the relational dimensions of the images/shots, it can not shed light on the actual affect of the art of cinema. That is because aesthetic and analytic communication is two disparate forms of language and two different communication systems. Whereas the former relies on intuitive and disinterested relations and requires un-graspable communication, the latter requires cause and effect continuity while the meaning unfolds as the signs follow one after another, either with words or images. If we consider language as a simple sing functioning, the meaning will disclose as the conversation continues. A sentence or a word or an image would designate the following one. If we consider the aesthetic dimensions of cinema, such linguistic explanation on the language of cinema is not adequate to understand neither the image-being nor the affect communicated by the work. Therefore, any analytic approach borrowed from linguistics to define a work of cinematic art can not help us understand the real value and communication that is structured by the ontic principle of the cinematic art's image-being. In this paper, to un-conceal the language cinema speaks, we will look into the structure of the cinematographic-image and decipher the aesthetic communication conveyed by the image.
Akbas, Gulsen D. (2012), Cinema: Aesthetics of Time, Istanbul Bilgi University MA thesis.
Deleuze, Gilles (1964), Marcel Proust et les signe, Presses Universitaires De France, Paris (Proust and Signs, transl. by Richard Howard, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota 2000).
Deleuze, Gilles (1966), Bergsonisme, Presses Universitaires De France, Paris (Bergsonism, transl. by Hugh Tomlinson & Barbara Habberjam, Zone Books, New York 1991).
Deleuze, Gilles (1968), Différence et Répétition, Presses Universitaires De France, Paris (Difference and Repetition, transl. by Paul R. Patton, The Athlone Press, London 1994).
Deleuze, Gilles (1983), Cinéma 1. L'image-mouvement, Ed. De Minuit, Paris (Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, transl. by Hugh Tomlinson & Barbara Habberjam, Athlone Press, London 1997).
Deleuze, Gilles (1985), Cinéma 2. L'image-temps, Ed. De Minuit, Paris (Cinema 2: The Time-Image, transl. by Hugh Tomlinson & Robert Galeta, University of Minnesota Press, Minneaopolis 1997).
Dufrenne, Mikel (1953), Phénoménologie de l'exprience esthtique, Presses Universitaires De France, Paris (The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience, transl. by Edward S. Casey, Northwestern University Press, Evanston 1973).
Hausman, Carl R. (1993) Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York 1993.
Kamini, Vellodi (2014), «Diagramatic Thought: Two Forms of Constructivism in C.S. Peirce and Gilles Deleuze», in Parrhesia, n. 19, 2014, pp. 79-95.
Liszka, James Jakob (1996), A General Introduction to the Semeiotics of Charles S. Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana 1996.
Metz, Christian (1974), Essais sur la signification au cinéma Vol. I, Oxford University Press, New York (Film Language: A Semiotics of The Cinema, transl. by Michael Taylor, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1991).
Peirce, Charles S. (1890-1892), The Peirce Edition Project (2010), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, volume 8: 1890-1892, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.
Tröhler, Margrit and Kirsten, Guido, edited by, (2018) Christian Metz and the Codes of Cinema: Film Semiology and Beyond, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam 2018.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.