On the non-specificity of slurs
A quite neglected question pertaining to the classification of the different theories on slurs concerns their extendibility to other pejoratives and expressives in general. In this paper, we show that the linguistic behaviour of pejoratives is similar to that of slurs. Therefore, a theory on slurs that is also extendible to other pejoratives and expressives is, other things being equal, preferable to a theory that is not applicable to other classes beyond slurs. Slurs seem to differ from other pejoratives as the latter seem to target single persons and not a class of persons. This implies that the derogatory component of slurs does not seem to project outside negative, conditional, modal and interrogative contexts. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that this difference is deceptive due to some specific features of the other pejoratives, such as targeting negative characteristics or having a fuzzy extension
Anderson, Luvell and Lepore, Ernie (2013a), «Slurring words», in Nous, 47, 1, pp. 25-48.
Anderson, Luvell and Lepore, Ernie (2013b), «What did you call me? Slurs as prohibited words», in Analytic Philosophy, 54, 1, pp. 350-363.
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C. (1987), Politeness. Some universals in language usage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cepollaro, Bianca (2015), «In defence of a presuppositional account of slurs», in Language Sciences, 52, pp. 36-45.
Croom, Adam M. (2011), «Slurs», in Language Sciences, 33, pp. 342-358.
Frigerio, Aldo and Tenchini, Maria Paola (2019), «Pejoratives: a classification of the connoted terms», in Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 13, 1, pp. 143-156.
Garcia-Carpintero, Manuel (2017), Pejoratives, contexts and presuppositions, in Brézillon, P., Turner, R. and Penco, C. (eds.), Modeling and Using Contexts, Springer, Cham, pp. 15-24.
Gutzmann, Daniel (2015), Use conditional meaning: studies in multidimensional semantics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hom, Christopher (2008), «The semantics of racial epithets», in Journal of Philosophy, 105, pp. 416-440.
Hom, Christopher (2010), «Pejoratives», in Philosophy Compass, 5, 2, pp. 164-185.
Hom, Christopher (2012), «A puzzle about pejoratives», in Philosophical Studies, 159, pp. 383-405.
Hom, Christopher and May, Robert (2013), «Moral and semantic innocence», in Analytic Philosophy, 54, 3, pp. 293-313.
Hom, Christopher and May, Robert (2018), Pejoratives as fiction, in Sosa, D. (ed.), Bad Words. Philosophical Perspectives on Slurs, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 108-131.
Macià, Josep (2002), «Presuposición y significado expresivo», in Theoria, 17, 3, pp. 499-513.
McCready, Eric (2010), «Varieties of conventional implicature», in Semantics and Pragmatics, 3, pp. 1-57.
Nunberg, Geoff (2018), The social life of slurs, in Fogal, D., Harris, D. W. and Moss M. (eds.), New Work on Speech Acts, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 237-295.
Potts, Christopher (2005), The logics of conventional implicatures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Potts, Christopher (2007), «The expressive dimension», in Theoretical Linguistics 33, 2, pp. 165–198.
Schlenker, Philippe (2007), «Expressive presuppositions», in Theoretical Linguistics, 33, 2, pp. 237-245.
Tenchini, Maria Paola and Frigerio, Aldo (2020), «The Impoliteness of Slurs and Other Pejoratives in Reported Speech», in Corpus Pragmatics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00073-w
Whiting, Daniel (2013), «It’s not what you said, It’s the way you said It: Slurs and conventional implicatures», in Analytic Philosophy, 54, 3, pp. 364-377.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.