Le considerazioni dell’oratore Demostene sui meccanismi decisionali collettivi nell’Atene del IV sec. a. C. / Demosthenes' Observations about the Collective Decision-Making in Fourth-Century Athens
Abstract
The paper aims to analyze the deliberation-way of the Athenians, especially according to Demosthenes’ point of view. The orator blames his fellow-citizens for their fickleness, their inconsistency and incongruity, their tendency to withdraw themselves from responsibilities, when they gather in Assembly in order to take a resolution. Which reason, if any, lies behind this criticism? In accordance with the circumstances, the orator asks for a rational debate or prepares in the way he wants the attitude of the audience; he can appreciate or blame it; and the attitude rebuked could be understood both as a fact as well as a provocative warning. Moreover Athenian people, bringing actions like eisangelia, probole, or graphe paranomon against rhetores who have cheated it, wants to reaffirm the right and non-culpable exercise of its sovereignty and the non-responsibility for the vote it has given taking their advice. But these procedures are at the same time tools rhetores exploit not just for moral principle, but rather for individualistic reasons in the political struggle between them.References
ANDERSEN, Øivind (2001), How Good Should an Orator Be? in [a cura di] WOOTEN C. W., The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome. Essays in Honor of G.A. Kennedy, Brill, Leiden, pp. 3-16.
ANDREWES, Antony (1962), «The Mytilene Debate: Thucydides III. 36-49» in Phoenix, n. 16,2, pp. 64-85.
BALOT, Ryan K. (2004), Free Speech, Courage and Democratic Deliberation in [a cura di] SLUITER Ineke and ROSEN Ralph M., Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, Brill (Mnemosyne. Supplementum 254), Leiden, pp. 233-259.
BEARZOT, Cinzia (1980), «Isocrate e il problema della democrazia» in Aevum, n. 54,1, pp. 113-131.
BERTELLI, Lucio (2005), Platone contro la democrazia (e l’oligarchia) in [a cura di] VEGETTI Mario, Platone. La Repubblica, traduzione e commento, vol. VI, libri VIII-IX, Bibliopolis, Napoli; pp. 295-396.
BIANCO, Elisabetta (2004), «La figura del rhetor in Demostene» in Sileno, n. 30,1/2, pp. 31-43.
CAMPESE, Silvia (2005), L’oikos e la decadenza delle città in [a cura di] VEGETTI Mario, Platone. La Repubblica, traduzione e commento, vol. VI, libri VIII-IX, Bibliopolis, Napoli, pp. 189-262.
CANEVARO, Mirko (2009), «L’accusa contro Leptine: crisi economica e consenso postbellico» in Quaderni del Dipartimento di Filologia, Linguistica e Tradizione Classica «A. Rostagni», n.s., n. 8, pp. 117-141.
CANFORA, Luciano (1989), Discorso scritto/discorso reale in Demostene in [a cura di] DETIENNE Marcel, Sapere e scrittura in Grecia, Laterza, Roma-Bari, pp. 109-117.
CANFORA, Luciano (1990), Gli oratori attici in [a cura di] BIANCHI BANDINELLI Ranuccio, Storia e civiltà dei Greci. La crisi della polis, 5, Bompiani, Milano. pp. 326-349.
CAREY, Christopher (2000), Democracy in Classical Athens, Bristol Classical Pr, London.
CARMIGNATO, Anna (1998), «Demostene e la parrhesia: diritto di critica e rifondazione dei valori democratici» in InvLuc, n. 20, pp. 33-57.
CLAVAUD, Robert (1974), Démostène, Prologues, texte établi et traduit, Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
COGAN, Marc (1981), The Human Thing. The Speeches and Principle of Thucydides’ History, Univ. of Chicago Pr, Chicago-London.
COZZO, Andrea (2010), Ascolto e politica nella Grecia antica e oggi in [a cura di] COZZO A., Le orecchie e il potere. Aspetti socioantropologici dell’ascolto nel mondo antico e nel mondo contemporaneo, Carocci, Roma, pp. 53-99.
DOVER, Kenneth John (1974), Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle, Univ. of California Pr., Berkeley (trad. it. La morale popolare greca all’epoca di Platone e Aristotele, Paideia Editrice, Brescia (1983).
FANTASIA, Ugo (2003), Tucidide, La Guerra del Peloponneso. Libro II, testo, traduzione e commento con saggio introduttivo, Ets, Pisa.
FULKERSON, Laurel (2004), «Metameleia and Friends: Remorse and Repentance in Fifth- and Fourth-Century Athenian Oratory» in Phoenix, n. 58, pp. 241-259.
GILLIS, Daniel (1970), «The Structure of Arguments in Isocrates’ De Pace» in Philologus, n. 114, pp. 195-210.
HARRISON, Alick Robin Walsham (1971), The Law of Athens, II, Procedure, Oxford Univ. Pr, Oxford (trad. it. Il diritto ad Atene, II, La procedura, Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria 2001).
HANSEN, Mogens Herman (1974), The Sovereignty of the Peoples' Court in Athens in the Fourth Century B.C. and the public action against unconstitutional proposals, Odense Univ. Pr, Odense (trad. it. Graphe paranomon. La sovranità del Tribunale popolare ad Atene nel IV secolo a.C. e l'azione pubblica contro proposte incostituzionali, Giappichelli, Torino 2001).
HANSEN, Mogens Herman (1975), Eisangelia. The Sovereignty of the People’s Court in Athens in the Fourth Century B.C. and the Impeachment of Generals and Politicians, Odense Univ. Pr, Odense (trad. it. Eisangelia. La sovranità del Tribunale popolare ad Atene nel IV secolo a. C. e l’accusa contro strateghi e politici, Giappichelli, Torino 1998).
HANSEN, Mogens Herman (1983), «The Athenian ‘Politicians’, 403-322 B.C.» in GRBS, n. 24,1, pp. 33-55.
HANSEN, Mogens Herman (1991), The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Structures, Principles and Ideology, Oxford, Blackwell (trad. it. La democrazia ateniese nel IV secolo a.C., trad. it., LED, Milano 2003).
HESK, Jon (2000), Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens, Cambridge Univ. Pr, Cambridge-New York.
HORNBLOWER, Simon (1997), A Commentary on Thucydides, v. I (Books I-III), Clarendon Pr, Oxford.
KAGAN, Donald (1975), «The Speeches in Thucydides and the Mitilene Debate» in YClS, n. 24, pp. 71-94.
KREMMYDAS, Christos (2012), Commentary on Demosthenes' Against Leptines: with Introduction, Text and Translation, Oxford Univ. Pr, Oxford-New York.
LONGO, Oddone (1983), «I discorsi tucididei: uditorio indiviso e scomposizione d’uditorio» in MCr, n. 18, pp. 139-160.
MANUWALD, Bernd (1999), Platon, Protagoras, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
MARA, Gerald M. (2008), The Civic Conversation of Thucydides and Plato. Classical Political Philosophy and the Limits of Democracy, Suny Press, New York.
MATHIEU, George (1925) = G. M., Les idées politiques d’Isocrate, Les Belles Lettres, Paris.
MILLER, Jeff (2002), «Warning the dêmos: Political Communication with a Democratic Audience in Demosthenes» in HPTh, n. 23,3, pp. 401-417.
MONTGOMERY, Hugo (1983), The Way to Chaeronea. Forign Policy, Decision Making and Political Influence in Demosthenes’ Speeches, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.
MORAUX, Paul (1954), «Thucydide et la rhétorique. Étude sur la structure de deux discours (III 37-48)» in LEC, n. 22,1, pp. 3-23.
MOSSÉ, Claude (1962), La fin de la démocratie athénienne, Paris.
MOSSÉ, Claude (1984), «Politeuomenoi et idiôtai: l’affirmation d’une classe politique à Athènes au IVe siècle» in REA, n. 86, pp. 193-200.
OBER, Josiah (1989), Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of People, Princeton Univ. Pr, Princeton.
PERLMAN, Shalom (1963), «The Politicians in the Athenian Democracy of the Fourth Century B.C.» in Athenaeum, n. 41, pp. 327-355.
PIEPENBRINK, Karen (2001), Politische Ordnungskonzeptionen in der attischen Demokratie des vierten Jahrhunderts v. Ch. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung zum philosophischen und rhetorischen Diskurs, Historia Eizelschriften 154, Steiner, Stuttgart.
PIEPENBRINK, Karen (2003), Reflexionen über Rhetorik in der attischen Demokratie des 4. Jh. v. Chr.: Isokrates und die „aktiven“ Redner im Vergleich in [a cura di] ORTH Wolfgang, Isokrates. Neue Ansätze zur Bewertung eines politischen Schiftstellers, Wissenschaftlicher Verl. Trier, Trier, pp. 43-61.
RHODES, Peter John (1994), Thucydides, History III; edited with a Translation and Commentary, Aris & Phillips, Warminster.
ROISMAN, Joseph (2004), Speaker-Audience Interaction in Athens: a Power Struggle in [a cura di] SLUITER Ineke and ROSEN Ralph M., Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, Brill (Mnemosyne. Supplementum 254), Leiden, pp. 261-278.
DE ROMILLY, Jacqueline (1975), Problèmes de la democratie grecque, Hermann, Paris.
RUPPRECHT, Albert (1927), «Die demosthenische Prooemiensammlung» in Philologus, n. 82, pp. 365-432.
SINCLAIR, Robert K. (1988), Democracy and Participation in Athens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
SWOBODA, Raimundus (1887), De Demosthenis quae feruntur Prooemiis, C. Konegen; Vindobonae.
TUPLIN, Christopher J. (1998), «Demosthenes’ Olynthiacs and the Character of the Demegoric Corpus» in Historia, n. 47,3, pp. 276-320.
WALLACE, Robert W. (2004), The Power to Speak – and not to Listen – in Ancient Athens in [a cura di] SLUITER Ineke and ROSEN Ralph M., Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, Brill (Mnemosyne. Supplementum 254), Leiden, pp. 221-232.
WASSERMANN, Felix Martin (1956), «Post-Periclean Democracy in Action: The Mytilenean Debate (Thuc. III 37-48)» in TAPhA, n. 87, pp. 27-41.
WESTLAKE, Henry Dickinson (1968), Individuals in Thucydides, Cambridge Univ. Pr, Cambridge.
WINNINGTON-INGRAM, Reginald P. (1965), «Τὰ δέοντα εἰπεῖν: Cleon and Diodotus» in BICS, n. 12, pp. 70-82.
YUNIS, Harvey Evan (1996), Taming Democracy: Models of Political Rhetoric in Classical Athens, Cornell Univ. Pr, Ithaca (N.Y.).
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
