Dalla forma al cluster: il percorso di Peirce verso l’analisi topologica della continuità
Abstract
This text tries to find, in the first phase of Peirce’s thought, the questions, which he tries, in the last phase of his work, to answer by topological analysis of continuity.
Topological analysis studies the models of connection of the parts of continua, that is to say it deals with the conditions which let the parts belong to a continuum. If it is seen in the perspective of the whole percian reflection on continuity, topological analysis appears no longer more as the search of a hidden structure to which reality has to be traced back to be understood. The focal point of the whole discussion will be the concept of Form, which becomes, during the course of Peirce’s thought, as I’ll try to demonstrate, something of very far from the idea of a structural schema. It becomes what in the last part of his thought Peirce calls cluster, that is to say a form that takes form starting from relations.References
DE TIENNE, André (1996), L’analytique de la représentation chez Peirce. La genèse de la théorie des catégories, Publication des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis, Bruxelles.
GAVA, Gabriele (2014), Peirce’s account of Purposefulness: a Kantian perspective, Routledge: London.
HAVENEL, Jérome (2008), “Peirce’s classification of continuity”, in Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, vol. 44, n. 1.
HULSWIT, Menno (2002), From cause to causation, a percian perspective, Springer, Dordrecht.
HÜNEFELDT, Thomas (2002), Peirces Dekonstruktion der Traszendentalphilosophie in eine phänomenologische Semiotik, Königshausen und Neumann Gmbh, Würzburg.
HUSSERL, Edmund (1985) , Per la fenomenologia della coscienza interna del tempo, (1893-1917), Angeli, Milano.
LISZKA, James, A general introduction to the semiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Indiana University press, Bloomington.
MURRAY G. MURPHEY(1993) The developement of Peirce Philosophy, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianopolis.
NÖTH, Winfried (2015), Three paradigms of iconicity research in language and literature, in Iconicity, John Benjamin publishing Co: Amsterdam.
PAOLUCCI, Claudio (2010), Strutturalismo e interpretazione, Bompiani, Milano.
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (1982), a cura di Max H. Fisch: Writings of Charles S. Peirce, a chronological edition, vol. 1: 1857-1866, Indiana University Press, Bloomington. (Per i riferimenti bibliografici interni al testo utilizzo la abbreviazione standard W1).
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (1984), a cura di Eward C. Moore: Writings of Charles S. Peirce, a chronological edition, vol. 2: 1867-1871, Indiana University Press, Bloomington. (Per i riferimenti bibliografici interni al testo utizzo la abbreviazione standard W2).
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (2010a), a cura di Nathan Hauser ed Andre de Tienne: Writings of Charles S. Peirce, a chronological edition, vol. 8: 1890-1892, Indiana University Press Bloomington. (Per i riferimenti bibliografici interni al testo utilizzo la abbreviazione standard W8).
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (2010b), a cura di Matthew E. Moore: Philosophy of mathematics: selecteted writings, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (1976),a cura di Carolyn Eisele: The new elements of mathematics, Mouton, The Hague.
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (1931-35; 1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–8., Harvard University Press, Cambridge. (Per i riferimenti bibliografici interni al testo utizzo la abbreviazione standard W8).
PEIRCE, Charles Sanders (2003), a cura di M.A.Bonfantini e G. Proni: Opere, Bompiani, Milano.
WHITNEY, William Dwight (a cura di) (1889-1909), The century dictionary, Century co, New York.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
