Abiti di genere. Outer world e inner world tra azione, immaginazione e Phantasie
Abstract
This paper aims at retracing and discussing a now almost thirty years old encounter between feminist philosophy, and a semiotics of subjectivity, and the Peircian theorization of the habit. In reading against the grain Teresa de Lauretis’ use of the category of habit – against the grain both of Peirce’s theorization and Feminist Theories - the paper aims at two main objectives: first of all to introduce into the debate on the actuality of Peirce’s semiotics the possibility of a study of subjectivities’ and identities’ construction and the way they are individually and collectively signified; secondly, to discuss how a cognitive and interpretative semiotics has still something to say, outside its strictly disciplinary boundaries, to the ways in which subjects, objects and their ‘significant’ relations can be thought of beyond neo-materialist and neo-realist epistemologies.References
ARFINI, E., LO IACONO, C. (2012), a cura di, Canone inverso. Antologia di teoria queer, ETS, Pisa.
DE LAURETIS, T. (1984), Alice Doesn't: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema, Indiana University Press and London: Macmillan, Bloomington.
DE LAURETIS, T. (1987), Technologies Of Gender. Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction, Indiana University Press, Bloomington (trad. it. parziale in de Lauretis 1996).
DE LAURETIS, T. (1991), «Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities», in Differences. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, n. 2, vol. 3, p. iii-xviii.
DE LAURETIS, T. (1994), The Practice of Love: Lesbian Sexuality and Perverse Desire, Indiana University Press, Bloomington (trad. it. Pratica d’amore. Percorsi del desiderio perverso, La Tartaruga Edizioni, Milano, 1997].
DE LAURETIS, T. (1996), Sui generis. Scritti di teoria femminista, Feltrinelli, Milano.
DE LAURETIS, T. (2007), Figures of Resistance: Essays in Feminist Theory, edited and with an introduction by Patricia White, University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago.
ECO, U. (1990), I limiti dell’interpretazione, Bompiani, Milano.
FOUCAULT, M. (2001), L’herméneutique du sujet, Seuil-Gallimard, Paris (trad.it., L’ermeneutica del soggetto. Corso al Collège de France (1981-1982), Feltrinelli, Milano, 2003).
JOHNSON, B. (1987), A World of Difference, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
LAPLANCHE, J., PONTALIS, J-B., (1967), Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse, PUF, Paris (trad.it., Enciclopedia della psicanalisi, Laterza, Roma-Bari, 1968).
MARCHETTI, S; MASCAT, J.M.H; PERILLI, V., (2012), a cura di, Femministe a parole. Grovigli da districare, Ediesse, Roma.
PEIRCE, Ch. S., (1931-1958), [CP] Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 voll., voll. 1-6 ed. by Ch. Harsthorne and P. Weiss; voll. 7-8 ed. by A. W. Burks, The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
VIOLA, T. (2013), «Peirce and Iconology: Habitus, Embodiment, and the Analogy between Philosophy and Architecture» in European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, IV/1, 6-31.
VIOLI, P.(1986), L’infinito singolare. Considerazioni sulle differenze sessuali nel linguaggio, Essedue Edizioni, Verona.
VIOLI P., (2007), «Remembering the Future. The Construction of Gendered Identity and Diversity in the Balkans» in GOH C. and MCGUIRK B. [eds.], Happiness and Post-Conflict, Critical, Culture, Communication Press, Nottingham, 189-200.
VIOLI P. (2008), «Beyond the body: towards a full embodied semiosis», in R. FRANCK, R.DIRVEN, et alii, eds., Body, Language and Mind. Volume 2: Sociocultural Situatedness, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 53-76.
VIOLI P. (2012), «How our Bodies Become Us: Embodiment, Semiosis and Intersubjectivity», in Cognitive Semiotics, vol.4-1, pp.57-75.
Works published in RIFL are released under Creative Commons Licence:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
